JW.org: “Jehovah’s Witnesses Do Not Shun”

October 13th, 2016

The Watchtower Society’s website, JW.org, now claims that “Those who were baptized as Jehovah’s Witnesses but no longer preach to others, perhaps even drifting away from association with fellow believers, are not shunned.” [LINK]

This is an amazing statement. It’s actually so amazing that tens of thousands of former Jehovah’s Witnesses will be surprised to know this amazing fact – especially since most of their former JW friends and family have indisputably shunned them for years – and for some, decades.

Here is a common and accepted definition of “shun” and “to shun:”
shun: persistently avoid, ignore, or reject (someone or something) through antipathy or caution. To avoid, evade, eschew, steer clear of, shy away from, keep one’s distance from, give a wide berth to, have nothing to do with.

Jehovah’s Witnesses may be surprised to learn that this is the Watchtower’s official policy – or at least the public version of their handling of wayward members.

A very high percentage of former Jehovah’s Witnesses would be very happy to have their separation from the Watchtower religion managed by that published and public definition.

Unfortunately, the reality appears to be quite different – especially when comparing the above statement with recent policy statements presented at the Watchtower’s 2016 conventions and TV.JW.org video presentations. According to reporter “Covert Fade” at website JWSurvey.org [LINK to article]:

“Essentially, any action that would result in a baptised Jehovah’s Witness being disfellowshipped will now result in an inactive one being shunned without the requirement for Judicial Committee action… 

“…This will come as deeply upsetting news for the many inactive ones who have “faded;” the term often used for those who, by a mixture of good fortune and careful planning, have managed to leave the Watchtower religion without sanction from a Judicial Committee, and thus avoided the penalty of shunning. Many such ones still have contact with their Jehovah’s Witness families; contact that now may be cut off if their families consider this person to be “sinning” in the way prescribed by the Governing Body.”

There may be another reason that there seems to be a disconnect between what the Q&A page on JW.org states with very firm and straightforward wording – and what Jehovah’s Witnesses are being taught at their 2016 summer conventions. Maybe the Watchtower wants to have a “public” policy AND an actual “internal” policy. They’ve been known to present a different story to the public than what may be actual fact within their congregations. Anyone remember the infamous term “theocratic strategy”?

Many former Jehovah’s Witnesses who may have decided to just fade away by no longer attending Kingdom Hall meetings or being involved in the door-to-door ministry, may suddenly find themselves unwelcome among their former friends and family for no other reason than the Watchtower making a policy change.

Those of us who closely watch the actions and changes (both public and private) within the Watchtower religion understand what is happening. The organization is bleeding members and losing more potential new converts because of two factors:

1. The effects of public disclosure by former members and the public press of their lack of credibility in dealing with child abusers and other criminals within their ranks.
2. The ever growing expansion of published news and private bloggers that expose unfair and unsupportable (not to mention “unChristian”) policies, handling of child abuse, and financial management by the Watchtower’s leadership.

It is no surprise to us at all that the Watchtower would use their JW.org website to publicly misinform readers, news agencies, and potential new recruits by misrepresenting the truth.

What is even more inexplicable is the fact that since their 2016 summer conventions, the Watchtower has reportedly begun to tighten the rules even more than publicly announced. The Watchtower leadership is taking a very hard line against any kind of dissent within their ranks. They are clearly using the threat of shunning to rein in those who might consider fading away into some forgotten obscurity. Taking away someone’s friends and family connections is cruel hammer, but the Watchtower’s leaders clearly do not care.

Categories: Conventions, JW Teachings, Watchtower Scandals

Tags: , ,
Leave a comment

Comments Feed10 Comments

  1. Alan

    How on earth does this work? They say one thing on their website but say the opposite even with videos about a mum and dad at the 2016 conventions!!!!! This is an ever so less obvious religion to Jim Jones and Jonestown. It lies (“they lie”, quote from Jim Jones himself) yet the liars are the 7 at watchtower city in Warwick. It’s lies are concealed within truth!? The blood doctrine, organ transplants and vaccination stance from the 60’s is this religions Koop aid. To quote another “apostate”, let’s review: IT’S A CULT!

  2. Irene

    My mother has started studying with these people and has started attending meetings. She lives with my semi-functioning alcoholic father. My 3 sisters and me are wondering if my mom will be asked to stop associating or talking to us, and if so, when? and what about her relationship with my father? How can we help my mother? Is there a legal way to keep these people away since they are a cult?

  3. Sylvia Althof

    It is a lie that JW does not shun their relatives. I am an ex JW. Most of my JW family shuns me but one of my relatives who didn’t shun me was reported to the elders and threatened with disfellowshipping so had to shun me against her will.

  4. Juan Viejo

    Jehovah’s Witnesses, especially elders, will defend the Watchtower beyond comprehension – even when the evidence is overwhelming. It’s like the old rebuke, “you going to believe me – or your lying eyes?” They are like thieves being caught with the evidence in their hands responding, “This stuff? What stuff? You must be confused.” Literally – that’s the way it is. Shunning began with 2nd WT president, Joseph Rutherford, when he tossed out and banned any contact with those on the Watchtower’s board of directors who voted against him to be Russell’s replacement. After that, it applied to anyone who took issue with something Rutherford or his assistants wrote or promoted – right or wrong, biblically supported or not. What really amazes me is the number of JWs who have in the past been shunned or have shunned their own friends and family – and then will turn around, look you in the eye, and tell you emphatically that JWs don’t shun! Those who admit it do not place the blame on the Watchtower, but will tell you that they, and they alone, made the choice to end relationships with former friends and family. Being shunned myself for well over 40 years by members of my own family – who, when you can get them away from other JWs, are very loving and interesting people who really seem to care. But they can not and will not go against their religion.

  5. Aleksandra Nowak

    Hi everyone I am a former JW I have published my book about my life and growing up as a JW. My dream is to get through to many people like me and know that we are now alone in this after leaving. Life can be amazing after JW , Please have a look at my book and let me know your thoughts
    https://www.amazon.com/Lily-Valley-K-Nowak/dp/1460270983/ref=tmm_pap_swatch_0?_encoding=UTF8&qid=&sr=

  6. Roberto

    This official statement does not relate to disfellowshipped or disassociated. Read the rest of the article from jw.org

  7. Alex

    My son is 12 years old and his mother and Half of is family which is large are JW’s. I am with little faith although I was raised Catholic. My son has told me he is a devoted JW and I feel that he is slowly slipping away from my family . Being 12 years old he has the right to say how much she wants to spend at dads. He has decided to cut half the days And only going to come on weekends. I would love to talk to someone for some advice. In hopes I can show my son that the JW’s are not he only choice. My name is Alex my phone number is 778-835-8921

  8. Michael Martie

    They still shun people, it’s how they keep people in. In my many years as a witness I have seen many families destroyed by this. This is a well written and truthful article.

  9. ex jw

    i was baptized at 16, disphellowshipped at 19. i am 33 now. and it is apparent to me now that the mind control and brainwashing off the witnesses is the corner stone of their “faith”
    it took years for me to even remotely realize this.
    up until a few years ago i would not even look at literature that they would call “apostate” even tho i had been disfellowshipped for a number of years already.
    i am a critical thinker and this is not welcome in any kingdom hall.
    there are no individuals in the “truth” only people blindly following the orders of old men. without question, and under the disguise of gods word.

    my heart goes out to any and all ex jws who have lost all the friends and family they cared about, over this religion of “brotherly love”

  10. Ms.Florencia Ragsdale

    I want to come back,, I was disfellowshiped years ago, will it be hard?

Leave a comment

WordPress Anti Spam by WP-SpamShield

Feed

http://ex-jw.com / JW.org: “Jehovah’s Witnesses Do Not Shun”

Log in |